robotnic.co

  • Home
  • Hello!
  • Reading Week
  • 52 Books

How to Make Films & Alienate Women

07.26.2010 by Nicola //

Between Inception, Rich Hall’s dissertations of the Dirty South and Westerns lost, and almost every other film I’ve watched in the past month, I needed a break. A break from men.

Have you ever heard of the Bechdel Test? Developed by a woman named Allison Bechdel to gauge the participation of female characters in Hollywood film. The test – also known as the Mo Movie Test – is based on three simple questions.

  1. Are there at least two women (with names) in the film?
  2. Do they talk to each other?
  3. Do they talk to each other about something other than a man?

Needless to say, there are disturbingly few Hollywood films that meet these criteria.

You may not find this useful, and are perfectly entitled to feel that way. However, as I watched In Her Shoes and pondered Hollywood’s collective epic test fail, my boyfriend sat down to watch for 5 minutes. There is a scene where Rose (Toni Collette) is at the Sixers basketball game with her boyfriend, and he gets into a conversation with some guys about the game. The second this scene ended, my boyfriend turned to me and, voice laden with sarcasm, said, “Well, that was a realistic representation of men discussing sport.”

Frankly, I find it heartening. This moment of trepidation about representing conversations between men is reminiscent of Jane Austen, who openly admitted that she did not write conversations between men because she has never heard one. If anything, this scene proves that what men say about sports is of little consequence to most women. Sweeping generalisations aside, this scene demonstrated more about the boyfriend Simon’s character than it failed to illustrate about men through language. 

Speaking of men, I mentioned Inception. At first, I thought, “Two women and five men isn’t such a bad ratio,” That is, until I counted properly. Marya at Cinema Fanatic has posted a few times recently about DiCaprio’s performances in Shutter Island and Inception, noting that his part of what makes his performances so excellent are his portrayals of characters tortured by guilt and the death of their wives. Mathilda Gregory has a different take on this. In her latest article entitled, “Want to give your male lead some depth? Give him a dead wife,” she postulates that the dead wife trope is a cheap trick that provides a shorthand for creating “interesting” male characters.

Inception is an intelligent, thoughtful film that self-reflexively challenges ideas about narrative. But sometimes it seems like enjoying popular culture and being a feminist seem mutually exclusive. I don’t want to have to turn my feminism off in the theatre just so I’m not niggled by the fact that instead of being treated as human beings with their own unique subjectivity, women in films are cheerfully shoved into white goods just so the hero can react to it with his best-ever acting and broody, brooding brood-face.

I guess that pretty much sums it up.

Do your favourite films pass the Mo Movie Test? Or is it plagued by moody widowers?

Categories // Film

Review: Rich Hall’s ‘How the West Was Lost’

07.24.2010 by Nicola //

 
Comedian Rich Hall goes west to find out what killed off that most quintessentially American of all film genres, the western.
Through films such as The Searchers, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence, Little Big Man, The Wild Bunch and Unforgiven, Rich charts the rise and fall of America’s obsession with its own creation myth – the Wild West. He explores how the image of the cowboy as a moral, straight-talking heroic figure was created by Hollywood but appropriated by Washington, as one president after another sought to associate themselves with this potent symbol of strength and valour.

On Tuesday, I recommended Rich Hall’s ‘Dirty South’.

Hall’s 2008 documentary, ‘How the West Was Lost’ was repeated on BBC4 this week. Having enjoyed Dirty South, I decided to watch and find out where Hall’s documentary film journey began, way out West.

With fewer acerbic diatribes and decidedly less Hollywood-bashing, Hall unravels the rich history of the Western genre, laying down a chronological timeline of, well, How the West Was Lost. From the early Westerns like My Darling Clementine, popularised by pulp novels and histories of the town of Tombstone, Hall and his film historian interviewees examine the growth of the genre and their appeal to American audiences.

From early-day Westerns to the proliferation of the 50s and the tumultuous 60s, Hall drags us through the Western mud to the death knell of the 70s. This industry-long film pilgrimage – many times longer than the Western frontier history itself – is examined with reference to the political climates in which the films were made and in relation to film history.

Ultimately over-long and without the tightly scripted verve of Dirty South, Hall has since outdone himself. How the West Was Lost is informative but easier on the wit, and at least 15 minutes too long. If you love yourself a Western, you may find it’s worth a watch. However, I still recommend that you catch Dirty South while you still can.

Have you watched Rich Hall’s Dirty South or How the West Was Lost? What are your thoughts?

Categories // Film

Book Review: Farewell, My Lovely by Raymond Chandler

07.22.2010 by Nicola //

Confession the first: I took a film noir class at university and, for the most part, hated it.

Crime fiction has never grabbed me. I forget characters’ names (particularly if they have nicknames or their first and second names are used interchangeably); I inevitably lose track of who is on which side; and by the time a character is reintroduced, I seldom remember why they were involved in the first place. And what’s with the constant descriptions of every piece of furniture?!

Confession the second: It took me about 3 reads of the first 2 chapters before I decided not to give up on this book.

Enough of my shortcomings as a reader. Admittedly, I’m glad I stuck with it.

Farewell, My Lovely is the story of Philip Marlowe, a private detective who is corralled into the company of the less-than-obsequious Moose Malloy, who, in search of his lost love Velma, shoots and murders a black man in a bar. While in search of Malloy, Marlowe digs his teeth into a case involving jewel thieves. Inevitably, the plots merge.

Despite my resistance, Chandler’s descriptions, replete with stunning metaphors and turns of phrase, allowed me to cast aside my issues with over-exposition and enjoy the ebb and flow.

The verdict? I’m glad I gave it a whirl. Since Farewell, My Lovely is widely considered Chandler’s best work, however, I’m in no rush to delve further into his bibliography.

Book #25: ★★★★★

Categories // Books

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 175
  • 176
  • 177
  • 178
  • 179
  • …
  • 198
  • Next Page »

Copyright © 2025 · Modern Studio Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in